Skip to content

Live now

The show is live. Join us now.

Watch live
Birdland TodayBaltimore baseball. Every day.

Blog Post

Why the Orioles’ Three Open 40-Man Roster Spots Matter

Share this post
Archival view of Oriole Park at Camden Yards before a game on June 1, 2013.

ROSTER ANALYSIS

Baltimore has three openings on its 40-man roster. How the Orioles use that room will help reveal which parts of the organization they value most.

The empty spaces are easy to overlook. Fans naturally focus on the players an organization acquires, the contracts it offers and the holes in its projected lineup. But roster room is part of the offseason budget, too.

MLB’s Orioles 40-man listing contained 37 players when checked on November 6. That leaves three openings—a snapshot, not a promise that all three will remain available for the same purpose. Baltimore can treat that space as a resource while it weighs additions and evaluates its own players.

Three openings, several competing uses

The 40-man roster extends beyond the active major-league team. That distinction matters when evaluating an offseason: a player can occupy organizational space without being part of the everyday lineup.

For Baltimore, the useful question is what an addition would accomplish. A player who could handle an immediate major-league job offers a different kind of value from a developing prospect whose best contribution might arrive later. Both can be worth keeping. Neither should earn a place simply because an opening exists.

Our view: the Orioles should judge the next addition against the alternatives it could displace. An apparently inexpensive move can still carry an opportunity cost if it narrows the club’s choices when a more useful player becomes available.

Prospect protection changes the calculation

Eligible prospects outside the 40-man roster can be selected in the major-league Rule 5 Draft. Protection decisions therefore compete with other offseason additions.

That creates a harder question than whether a prospect is interesting. Baltimore also has to assess how much another organization would value him, how his development fits the Orioles’ plans and whether retaining him is a better use of space than the available alternatives.

A familiar name can feel safer than an unfamiliar acquisition. The reverse can be true, too: a new player can seem more exciting simply because he is new. Neither reaction is a substitute for evaluating the role, the upside and the likelihood of a meaningful contribution.

This is a framework for reading Baltimore’s decisions, not a claim that any particular prospect will be protected or lost. Individual eligibility and the club’s eventual choices require separate verification.

What to watch when Baltimore makes its next move

Start with the purpose. Does the addition improve a likely major-league role, preserve a player with a plausible future in Baltimore or offer a development opportunity the organization believes it can capitalize on?

Then consider the sequence. Using an opening today reduces the room available for the next decision. Keeping one available preserves a choice, but an empty spot does not produce outs or runs by itself. Flexibility has value only if the club eventually uses it well.

The standard should be the quality of the roster Baltimore is building, rather than how quickly it reaches 40 names. Three openings give the Orioles options. The next few choices will tell us more than the number alone.

For another part of the offseason picture, read our analysis of Baltimore’s rotation priorities.

Sources and reporting context

Research cutoff: November 6, 2026, 8 p.m. Eastern. Roster totals can change after publication. Evaluations and recommendations above are Birdland Today analysis.

Photo: Oriole Park at Camden Yards on June 1, 2013, by Keith Allison, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 2.0. Archival photograph; original image unmodified. Website display may crop the image.

Baltimore OriolesRoster AnalysisOrioles40-man rosterRule 5 Draftoffseason